「consensus」の検索結果

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate consensus sequences and manage reference files using samtools. Use when creating consensus from alignments, indexing references, or creating sequence dictionaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consensus cell type annotation: runs 10+ algorithms (KNN-Harmony/BBKNN/Scanorama/scVI, CellTypist, ONCLASS, Random Forest, SCANVI, SVM, XGBoost) on a labeled reference and transfers labels via majority voting. Outputs per-method labels, consensus, agreement score. Use when single-method annotation is insufficient or you need ensemble uncertainty for novel states.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel multi-AI cross-validation research workflow (大版本). Dispatch N internal sub-agents + grok + gemini in parallel, automatically cross-validate findings, tier by confidence (strong consensus / partial / conflict / insufficient), generate tiered action items with arbitration. Use when user says "多 AI 调研", "交叉验证", "独立共识", "三脑调研", "multi-ai research", "parallel research", "cross-validate", or needs deep research that benefits from internal data + external 2026 consensus. NOT for quick factual Q&A, pure code reasoning, or tasks needing deep project context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from source code (C/C++, Python) for formal verification of distributed systems. Use when users need to: (1) Generate TLA+ specs from program implementations, (2) Model distributed systems, consensus protocols, or concurrent algorithms, (3) Extract state variables, actions, and invariants from code, (4) Create formal specifications for model checking with TLC, (5) Verify safety and liveness properties of distributed systems. Particularly effective for message-passing systems, replication protocols, consensus algorithms, and distributed transactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly product-level commercial tracking — TRx/NRx with current/4-wk/12-wk share and YoY, launch curves overlaid with same-class analogs plus a consensus-implied trajectory, LOE/biosimilar erosion series, GTN/net-price stress brackets, and per-row data-caveat discipline. Use to track any launched drug, biologic, device, or vaccine against its class and consensus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Institution ratings, consensus price targets, EPS/revenue forecasts, finance calendar, shareholder data, fund holders, insider trades (SEC Form 4), short interest, industry rankings, peer group analysis via Longbridge. Frameworks: investment proposals, coverage initiation, stock research, competitive analysis, financial planning, and DeFi/on-chain analysis. Triggers: "机构评级", "目标价", "一致预期", "EPS预测", "内部人交易", "空头", "行业排名", "投资提案", "首次覆盖", "竞争格局", "财务规划", "DeFi收益", "链上数据", "機構評級", "目標價", "一致預期", "內部人交易", "空頭", "投資提案", "首次覆蓋", "競爭格局", "鏈上數據", "analyst rating", "price target", "consensus", "insider trades", "short interest", "coverage initiation", "DeFi yield", "on-chain", "earnings calendar", "finance calendar", "财报日历", "下周谁财报", "下周财报", "下周有哪些财报", "哪些财报", "谁财报", "FOMC", "非农", "股东", "谁持有", "股東", "基金持仓", "基金持倉", "機構評級", "目標價", "財務規劃"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational impossibility result proving consensus cannot be guaranteed in asynchronous systems with even one faulty process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational distributed computing algorithms for consensus, coordination, and fault tolerance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level distributed systems theory covering consistency models, consensus algorithms, fault tolerance, replication, distributed transactions, and the CAP theorem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an autonomous consensus round between agent peers on several machines: they negotiate a decision over a shared channel and execute it without a human relaying messages. Use when multiple machines must agree on a change. Triggers: "/03", "work it out among yourselves", "find consensus". Wakes the human only for irreversible actions or a deadlock.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en systèmes distribués v2 (CAP, consensus, partitions, consistence événuelle, patterns)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en systèmes distribués (CAP theorem, consensus, partitions, vector clocks)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en annotation de données avancé (annotation, quality, active learning, consensus, tools)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en collaboration entre agents IA (swarm, débat, vote, délégation, consensus)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants all 16 personality types (16-minds plugin) to vote on a proposal — yes/no/abstain — to see stakeholder distribution, detect hidden objections, or simulate organizational consensus. Triggers on Japanese phrases like 「全人格で投票」「16人格に賛否を聞いて」「ステークホルダーシミュ」「これ通せそう？」, English equivalents like "vote with all 16 minds" / "stakeholder simulation", or `--vote` flag on 16-minds commands. Different from /minds (which is for opinion divergence) — this is for binary judgment aggregation.