「feasibility」の検索結果

Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and validate durable data and ML feasibility studies using the Feasibility Study Interchange Profile, constrained YAML authority, UUID URN identity, lifecycle lineage, and evidence traceability. Use when assessing whether available data and technical evidence support a proposed outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages backup and archive data under retention schedules and erasure obligations. Covers the technical infeasibility exception for backup deletion, backup cycle alignment with retention periods, restore-and-delete procedures, and interim protective measures during backup retention. Activate for backup deletion, archive erasure, backup retention, restore and delete, technical infeasibility queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

本格的な開発に進む前に小さな試作品を動かし、アイデアの実現性や方式の違いを検証して、実行結果を根拠に採用・調整・見送りの判断をまとめるスキル。

• アイデアの実現性を確かめたいとき
• 二つの方式を同じ条件で比較
• 本格開発前の例外条件の検証

Analyzes encryption algorithms, key management, and file encryption routines used by ransomware families to assess decryption feasibility, identify implementation weaknesses, and support recovery efforts. Covers AES, RSA, ChaCha20, and hybrid encryption schemes. Activates for requests involving ransomware cryptanalysis, encryption analysis, key recovery assessment, or ransomware decryption feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (template-based MCTS), maintained or version-pinned template-free models, ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, configurable MCTS rewards, building-block availability, and forward-prediction checks. Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clinical study operations — protocol structure, endpoint selection, eligibility design, sample-size and power planning, site feasibility, and documentation readiness. Use when planning, auditing, or costing a study.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when your human partner has explicitly opted into exploratory or feasibility mode - a compute-heavy simulation, an unproven pipeline, an unbenchmarked solver, an untested cluster job - or when whether the work can run at all is still unknown, when a plan's largest configuration has never been executed, when a memory or wall-clock ceiling is estimated rather than measured, or when someone proposes pre-registering over runs that have never happened

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/tribunal", "tribunal", "review this", "3-way review", "risk-value-feasibility check", or wants multi-perspective adversarial review. Also triggered by: "트리뷰널", "리뷰 해줘", "3관점 리뷰", "위험성 검토". Runs 3 agents (Risk/Value/Feasibility) in parallel and synthesizes a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, score, and prioritize Salesforce AI use cases before any implementation begins — opportunity identification, Impact-Effort matrix scoring, feasibility evaluation across Technical/Operational/Data/Risk dimensions, and ROI framing. NOT for the license checks and enablement steps once a use case is approved — use agentforce/agentforce-service-ai-setup or agentforce/agentforce-sales-ai-setup. NOT for making the data model AI-ready — use architect/ai-ready-data-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes encryption algorithms, key management, and file encryption routines used by ransomware families to assess decryption feasibility, identify implementation weaknesses, and support recovery efforts. Covers AES, RSA, ChaCha20, and hybrid encryption schemes. Activates for requests involving ransomware cryptanalysis, encryption analysis, key recovery assessment, or ransomware decryption feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes encryption algorithms, key management, and file encryption routines used by ransomware families to assess decryption feasibility, identify implementation weaknesses, and support recovery efforts. Covers AES, RSA, ChaCha20, and hybrid encryption schemes. Activates for requests involving ransomware cryptanalysis, encryption analysis, key recovery assessment, or ransomware decryption feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify drug repurposing candidates via target-based, compound-based, and disease-based strategies. Combines drug-target-disease network reasoning with mechanism rationale, clinical-trial precedent, and patent/regulatory feasibility. Use for hypothesis-generating repurposing for orphan diseases, finding existing drugs for new indications, and prioritizing candidates by evidence and feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (MCTS, template-based), Chemformer (template-free transformer), ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, building-block availability (eMolecules, Enamine, Mcule), forward prediction validation (Molecular Transformer), and disconnection-aware multi-objective search (MO-MCTS). Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

実行可能性（feasibility）を確認する。問題の複雑度に応じて一発解きor段階的解法を選ぶ

Extract study sites, observational variables, coordinates, climate-forcing sources, and cited data sources from ecosystem-modeling papers, PDFs, supplements, or article text, then plan or create EcoSIM simulation workflows and run folders for those sites. Use when Codex is asked to read a paper for EcoSIM feasibility, including requests phrased as "read paper for ecosim feasibility"; read a paper for sites/data availability; reproduce a published site simulation in EcoSIM; compare EcoSIM outputs to paper observations; or convert paper-derived AmeriFlux, FLUXNET, US NLDAS-domain, non-US ERA5, crop, peatland, forest, grassland, wetland, or unmanaged field-site information into EcoSIM inputs and runnable cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn assumptions, funnel opportunities, and product questions into a prioritised, feasibility-checked experiment backlog. Filters by traffic reality, metric latency, and method feasibility — not just ICE/RICE scoring. Maintains a living portfolio with status (idea → designed → running → readout → archived). Load when the user says "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "prioritise our tests", "where should we experiment", "what's worth testing", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs retrosynthetic planning using AiZynthFinder (MCTS, template-based), Chemformer (template-free transformer), ASKCOS, and emerging RetroSynFormer with explicit handling of route scoring, building-block availability (eMolecules, Enamine, Mcule), forward prediction validation (Molecular Transformer), and disconnection-aware multi-objective search (MO-MCTS). Use when assessing synthetic feasibility of generated or selected molecules, planning multi-step syntheses, building synthesis-aware design pipelines, or screening libraries for retro-route feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes encryption algorithms, key management, and file encryption routines used by ransomware families to assess decryption feasibility, identify implementation weaknesses, and support recovery efforts. Covers AES, RSA, ChaCha20, and hybrid encryption schemes. Activates for requests involving ransomware cryptanalysis, encryption analysis, key recovery assessment, or ransomware decryption feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when an active or proposed trip needs planning, logistics, feasibility, entry or transit checks, itinerary work, or investigation of an airport process, immigration, ground transport, a transfer, or fast-track service, even for a narrow question with no booking intent. Route a bounded flight, hotel, restaurant, event, or other item ready for live availability or booking directly to Booking. Skip this skill for a stable travel fact alone or flight status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for authorized RF/SDR security research including signal identification, replay feasibility study in shielded labs, and wireless protocol analysis outside classic Wi-Fi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two related workflows for a locally-cloned codebase, in one skill. Documentation mode produces a single, comprehensive, verifiable architecture document primarily by reading files on disk (local-first) — use it whenever the user wants to understand, map, document, research, or onboard onto a codebase ("research this repo", "write up the architecture", "do an architecture deep dive", "document how this codebase works", "map the system design", "create an onboarding doc"). Modernization mode generates a phased plan to modernize, migrate, upgrade, or rewrite a legacy system ("modernize this", "plan the migration", "how would we rewrite this", "how do we get off this legacy stack"); if no architecture document exists yet it first runs Documentation mode, then continues straight through to the plan. It assumes the legacy stack may be dead, runs a time-boxed feasibility spike, and picks the highest achievable rung on a safety ladder instead of demanding a fully-green legacy CI gate up front.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。