本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ase-code-refactor

Refactor Code: Use when user wants to "refactor" or "change" the code base.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md8.7 KB
  • help.md4.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

@${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-control.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-skill.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-dialog.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-getopt.md

<purpose name="ase-code-refactor"> Refactor Source Code </purpose>

<expand name="getopt" arg1="ase-code-refactor" arg2="--auto|-a --dry|-d --direct|-D --quick|-Q --next|-n=(none|DONE|EDIT|GRILL|DRAFT|IMPLEMENT)..."> $ARGUMENTS </expand>

<if condition="<getopt-option-quick/> is equal `true`"> The `--quick`/`-Q` flag is a *shorthand alias*: set <getopt-option-auto/> to `true`, <getopt-option-dry/> to `true`, and <getopt-option-next/> to `IMPLEMENT,DELETE`. Do not output anything. </if> <objective> *Refactor* existing artifacts the following way: <request><getopt-arguments/></request> </objective>

@${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-format-task.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-tenets.md @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../meta/ase-common-code.md

Procedure

<if condition="<getopt-option-direct/> is not equal to 'true'"> You *MUST* *NOT* call `Edit`, `Write`, `NotebookEdit`, or any filesystem-modifying tool, nor execute any filesystem-modifying shell command, during this entire skill. The *only* permitted way to persist artifacts is via the `ase_task_save(...)` MCP tool. </if> <else> The `--direct`/`-D` mode applies the refactoring *in place*, so STEP 4 below *requires* `Edit` and `Write` to modify the affected artifacts. Every modification *MUST* still stay restricted to the artifacts the refactoring actually demands, and you *MUST* *NOT* call `ase_task_save(...)`, as no task plan is composed at all. </else> <flow>
  1. <step id="STEP 1: Reason About Refactoring">
    1. <if condition=" <request/> matches the regexp `^[a-zA-Z0-9#][a-zA-Z0-9#_-]*$` "> Set <ase-task-id><request/></ase-task-id> (set task id to request) and <request></request> (set request empty), call the ase_task_id(id: "<ase-task-id/>", session: "<ase-session-id/>") tool from the ase MCP server to switch the task, and then only output the following <template/>:

      <template> ⧉ **ASE**: ◉ task: **<ase-task-id/>**, ▶ status: **task given** </template> </if>
    2. <if condition=" <request/> has the format `<id/>: <text/>` AND <id/> matches the regexp `^[a-zA-Z0-9#][a-zA-Z0-9#_-]*$` "> Set <request><text/></request> and <ase-task-id><id/></ase-task-id> and call the ase_task_id(id: "<ase-task-id/>", session: "<ase-session-id/>") tool from the ase MCP server to implicitly switch the task. Do not output anything. </if>

    3. <if condition="<request/> is empty"> Ask the user interactively, without a special tool, for the initial request with a single question:

      **No refactoring details known yet. What is the refactoring you want to request?**

      Then set <request/> to the response of the user. </if>

    4. <if condition=" <ase-task-id/> is equal `default` and <request/> is not empty "> Call the ase_task_newid(title: "<title/>", proposal: "<proposal/>") tool from the ase MCP server, where <title/> is a brief title summarizing <request/> and <proposal/> is a task id derived from <request/>, which consists of two lower-case words concatenated with a - character, and set <ase-task-id/> to the id field of its response -- the tool derives the id according to the task id scheme of the project, so you MUST NEVER assemble it yourself. Then call the ase_task_id(id: "<ase-task-id/>", session: "<ase-session-id/>") tool from the ase MCP server to implicitly switch the task. Do not output anything. </if>

    5. Report the task and request with the following <template/>:

      <template> ⧉ **ASE**: ◉ task: **<ase-task-id/>** ⧉ **ASE**: ⇌ request: **<request/>** </template>
    6. Figure out what the artifact refactoring <request/> is about.

    7. Ask the user for clarification if the goal of this refactoring is too unclear.

    8. Do not output anything else in this step, unless you asked the user.

    </step>
  2. <step id="STEP 2: Investigate Code Base">
    1. Check the existing source files for all code which is related to the refactoring <request/>.

    2. Check the architecture of the existing code base to understand the overall structures and dynamics.

    3. Do not output anything in this STEP 2.

    </step>
  3. <step id="STEP 3: Internalize Refactoring Tenets">
    1. <task-kind>REFACTORING</task-kind>

    2. <expand name="code-tenets" arg1="<task-kind/>"></expand>

    3. Do not output anything in this STEP 3.

    </step>
  4. <if condition="<getopt-option-direct/> is equal to 'true'"> <step id="STEP 4: Direct Refactoring">
    1. Directly apply the refactoring <request/> by modifying the affected artifacts with a corresponding, complete change set, based on your gathered knowledge about the code base and your internalized refactoring tenets. Also, if a CHANGELOG.md file exists, make an appropriate entry there, too.

    2. Output only the following <template/>:

      <template> ⧉ **ASE**: ◉ task: **<ase-task-id/>**, ▶ status: **changes directly applied** </template>
    3. Then IMMEDIATELY STOP all further skill processing. You MUST NOT output anything else in this STEP 4 or after it -- independent of <ase-project-boxing/>, whose exposure rules are explicitly overridden here. Especially, do not output a change summary, a list of modified artifacts, a rationale, or a unified diff of the changes.

    </step> </if> <else> <step id="STEP 4: Choose Refactoring Approaches">

    <expand name="code-approaches" arg1="refactoring" arg2="refactoring"></expand>

    </step> <step id="STEP 5: Compose Refactoring Plan">
    1. Compose a refactoring plan for the chosen refactoring A<n/> by closely aligning to the existing architecture and the existing code base. Use the <format/> defined for a task plan and inject the information from refactoring A<n/> and all derived realization decisions into it. Store the resulting task plan in <task-content/>.

      If a CHANGELOG.md file exists in the project (or in any affected sub-package), the plan MUST include, as an IMP bullet-point of its ## DESIGN (HOW) section, an explicit bullet-point describing the addition of a corresponding new entry to that CHANGELOG.md file, aligned with its existing style and conventions.

      <if condition="<getopt-option-dry/> is equal `true`"> You *MUST* completely omit the `## VERIFICATION (WHEN)` section (including its heading and all of its bullet points) from <task-content/>. </if>

      You MUST NOT call Edit, Write, NotebookEdit, or any filesystem-modifying tool during this step.

    2. Call the ase_timestamp(format: "yyyy-LL-dd HH:mm") tool of the ase MCP server and use the text field of its response for <timestamp-created/> and <timestamp-modified/> information. Then insert the current <ase-task-id/>, <timestamp-created/>, <timestamp-modified/>, and <task-kind/> information.

    3. You then MUST save the resulting plan content with the ase_task_save(id: "<ase-task-id/>", text: "<task-content/>", create: <create/>) MCP tool call only -- NEVER by executing a shell command -- where <create/> is true if <ase-task-id/> was allocated via ase_task_newid in STEP 1, else false. If this call fails because the task already exists (a concurrent session took the same id), allocate and switch to a new <ase-task-id/> exactly as in STEP 1, re-insert it, and save again.

    4. Output a hint with the following <template/>:

      <template> ⧉ **ASE**: ◉ task: **<ase-task-id/>**, ▶ status: **plan created** </template>
    5. Directly pass through control to the next skill:

      <expand name="code-next-dispatch"></expand>

    </step> </else>
</flow>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Review software architecture, including package cohesion and inter-package coupling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rse/ase582026年10月10日 更新

Discover additional, third-party components (libraries/frameworks) for the technology stack to provide needed functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rse/ase582026年10月10日 更新

Analyze the source code for problems in either the logic and semantics and its related control flow, performance and efficiency, or security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rse/ase582026年10月10日 更新

Craft Source Code: Use when user wants to "create", "add", or "craft" a new feature from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rse/ase582026年10月10日 更新

Edit Source Code: Use when the user wants to "edit" the code base in one shot from a query or a bare analyzer issue id like "P1", fusing crafting, refactoring, and resolving with optional grilling, verification, looping, and Git worktree isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rse/ase582026年10月10日 更新

Explains code with WHAT, WHY, ANALOGY, DIAGRAM, CRUXES, and GOTCHAS. Use when you want to know how code works or when the user asks "how does this work?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rse/ase582026年10月10日 更新

rse のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する