Read a designer's taste through their typography decisions alone. Type is the fastest taste signal in any design. Use when evaluating design maturity, assessing portfolio quality, or understanding what typography reveals about design thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dragoon0x/taste-skills☆ 62026年2月27日 更新
Alternative Slowbar coffee intelligence — scientific analysis from seed to cup using First Principle + System Thinking. Covers: varieties, terroir, cultivation, disease diagnosis, processing, roasting physics/chemistry, extraction science, brewing, business strategy, storytelling. ALWAYS trigger for coffee-related questions requiring scientific depth. DO NOT trigger for simple recipes or general food questions. Style: science-driven, farmer-first, quality-obsessed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ElmatadorZ/alternative-coffee-claudeskill☆ 62026年8月5日 更新
Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hybridlabor-api/aos☆ 62026年10月12日 更新
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
hybridlabor-api/aos☆ 62026年10月12日 更新
Design thinking and taste-building principles based on Dieter Rams. Use when making design decisions, reviewing UI quality, or building taste for any visual interface — web or native.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JordanCoin/ios-skills-collection☆ 62026年9月10日 更新
Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JordanCoin/ios-skills-collection☆ 62026年9月10日 更新
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
abekoh/dotfiles☆ 52026年10月3日 更新
Server management principles and decision-making. Process management, monitoring strategy, and scaling decisions. Teaches thinking, not commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AxelMrak/ai☆ 52026年2月20日 更新
Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AxelMrak/ai☆ 52026年2月20日 更新
Node.js development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, security, and architecture. Teaches thinking, not copying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AxelMrak/ai☆ 52026年2月20日 更新
Mobile-first design thinking and decision-making for iOS and Android apps. Touch interaction, performance patterns, platform conventions. Teaches principles, not fixed values. Use when building React Native, Flutter, or native mobile apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AxelMrak/ai☆ 52026年2月20日 更新
Master guide for using Claude Code effectively. Includes configuration templates, prompting strategies "Thinking" keywords, debugging techniques, and best practices for interacting with the agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AxelMrak/ai☆ 52026年2月20日 更新
Production deployment principles and decision-making. Safe deployment workflows, rollback strategies, and verification. Teaches thinking, not scripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AxelMrak/ai☆ 52026年2月20日 更新
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
commercetools/nimbus☆ 52026年10月12日 更新
Build project-level design systems based on Material Design principles. Use when creating a new design system, extracting one from an existing product, extending tokens or components, or reviewing UI for design system compliance. Outputs a project-level Agent Skill with token definitions and component specifications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kurogoma4D/cc-tools☆ 52026年3月11日 更新
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AndrewBrown-USDA/aigb-skills-usda☆ 52026年10月10日 更新
Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents, enabling natural multi-agent conversations where each agent is a real subagent with independent thinking. Use when user requests party mode, wants multiple agent perspectives, group discussion, roundtable, or multi-agent conversation about their project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
stellar-zk/stellar-zk☆ 42026年10月10日 更新
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
StrayDragon/oratio☆ 42026年2月10日 更新
変更に含まれる設計判断・実装選択の論理的整合性を徹底的に検証し、確証バイアスを排除して判断精度を高める
s977043/river-review☆ 42026年10月12日 更新
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases ("grill me", "grill with docs").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
sebastianbreguel/dotfiles☆ 32026年10月8日 更新
YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT answer directly) when the user describes a new product idea, asks whether something is worth building, wants to think through design decisions for something that doesn't exist yet, or is exploring a concept before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Apply Boyd's OODA loop to navigate fast-moving, uncertain, or competitive situations — Observe what is actually happening, Orient through mental models and context, Decide on the clearest path, Act quickly, then loop again. Load when the situation is changing faster than the current plan, when a competitive response is needed, when the user is stuck in analysis paralysis in a dynamic environment, when shipping under uncertainty, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a fast-moving / competitive frame. Triggers on "what should we do right now", "the situation is changing", "how do we respond to this", "competitive response", "we need to move fast", or "we're stuck deciding". Based on John Boyd's OODA loop — Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — adapted for product and business contexts (OODA Canvas 2026).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026年8月8日 更新
Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dvy1987/agent-loom☆ 32026年8月8日 更新