「reality」の検索結果

Break the spell of local productivity. Ask whether completing all open beads actually closes the gap to the project goal. Use at milestones or when busy agents feel directionally off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize project documentation and codebase into comprehensive roadmap status, gaps analysis, and blockers. Use when assessing project health, identifying blockers, tracking progress, comparing plan vs reality, documenting risks, or planning next milestones. Triggers: "roadmap", "project status", "blockers", "risks", "progress", "next milestone", "gaps", "what's done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Actuary — estimating unpaid claim reserves with chain-ladder or Bornhuetter-Ferguson methods, building or reviewing a rate indication from loss experience, applying credibility weighting to thin or volatile data, drafting a statement of actuarial opinion, or diagnosing whether a reserve or pricing assumption has stopped matching reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first revenue, pricing, refunds, team-billing, and billing-model truth workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a sales snapshot, pricing comparison, duplicate-charge diagnosis, or code-backed billing reality instead of generic payments advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts, filters, annotates, and exports differential expression results from DESeq2 or edgeR with proper handling of padj=NA (independent filtering, Cook's outliers, all-zero), multiple-testing correction choice (BH vs Storey q-value vs IHW vs lfsr), TREAT vs post-hoc fold-change filtering, p-value histogram diagnostics, gene annotation via org.db/biomaRt/mygene, GSEA preranked input, ORA background construction, replication reality (Schurch 2016 small-n result), and SABV/sex-stratified reporting. Use when extracting and interpreting DE results, troubleshooting padj=NA, choosing FDR method, preparing ranked lists for pathway analysis, annotating gene IDs, or comparing DESeq2 vs edgeR outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether commonly-excluded patients (eating disorders, elderly ≥75, upper GI disease) can actually receive a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Use when a clinician asks "can I give semaglutide to a patient with binge eating disorder / anorexia / bulimia", "is liraglutide safe in an 80-year-old", "GLP-1 with GERD or chronic gastritis", "GLP-1 in sarcopenic elderly", or anytime a patient is being ruled out for GLP-1 therapy based on a perceived contraindication. Grounded in Gorgojo-Martínez 2023 §6 (Myths or Reality).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP, CHANGELOG. Use as a meta-router when several skills could apply, and as the baseline for how delivery state is recorded. Trigger at the start of any multi-track epic, when the skill count exceeds ~12, or when the records have drifted from reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding, reviewing, or debugging Launch at Login in a macOS app — SMAppService registration, the requiresApproval state, a Settings toggle that reflects reality, and migration off deprecated login-item APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve the current system date and time to anchor the agent in present reality. Use for questions involving today, current time, recent events, or information newer than the model's training data to prevent knowledge-cutoff errors and fictionalization of real facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to actually run every kind of test in nuxt-crouton (unit/e2e/typecheck/lint, verified commands) plus the HONEST coverage picture — which packages have real tests vs zero, the dormant skipped/todo cases behind three mocking walls, and what CI truly gates vs what CLAUDE.md claims. Use when asked "how do I run the tests", "is X covered by tests", "what does CI actually check", "why is this suite skipped", "where do I add a test", or before trusting a green build as evidence that something works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mine a codebase for breakthrough, evidence-backed opportunities — features, additions, refactors, simplifications, DX, UX, reliability, performance, or architecture cleanup. Researches project reality first, then forces two escalation gates (reject the merely-adequate idea; expand ambition 10x then collapse to the smallest proof-bearing artifact). Outputs ranked opportunities, an escalation ledger, and one plan seed. Does not implement or create tickets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "pick which social channels to run", "should we be on X platform or 小红书", or "plan our organic social channel portfolio"; produces an audience/objective-first portfolio with capability/access matrix, cadence-budget reality check, declared ECHO operating profile, boundary routing, and proposed-state registry events. Not for recording canonical channel facts — use channel-registry. 社媒渠道选择/渠道组合规划/平台能力矩阵/自然社媒

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a user interface under real-world conditions across responsiveness, hostile content, interaction states, accessibility, network failure, interruption, and complete user journeys, reporting observable user harm with evidence rather than aesthetic opinion. Use whenever the user wants to stress-test a UI, verify responsive and edge-case behaviour, inspect loading/error/empty/recovery states, review a flow for friction, or find where an interface fails under reality. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving observable user harm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create multiplayer spatial board games using TabletopKit on visionOS. Use when building tabletop game experiences with boards, pieces, cards, and dice, managing player seats and turns, synchronizing game state over FaceTime with Group Activities, rendering game elements with RealityKit, or implementing piece snapping and physics on a virtual table surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build 3D scenes and visualizations using SceneKit. Use when creating 3D views with SCNView and SCNScene, building node hierarchies with SCNNode, applying materials and lighting, animating with SCNAction, simulating physics with SCNPhysicsBody, loading 3D models (.usdz, .scn), adding particle effects, or embedding SceneKit in SwiftUI with SceneView. Note: SceneKit was deprecated at WWDC 2025 and is in maintenance mode; RealityKit is recommended for new projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

3D print models generated with Meshy AI. Handles printability analysis, slicer integration, multi-color printing guidance, and print-optimized download workflows. Use when the user mentions 3D printing, slicing, Bambu, OrcaSlicer, Prusa, Cura, Creality Print, or wants to print a figurine, miniature, or physical model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete VPN server setup from scratch. Takes a fresh VPS (IP + root + password from hosting provider) through full server hardening and 3x-ui (Xray proxy panel) installation with VLESS Reality or VLESS TLS. Guides user through connecting via Hiddify client. Use when user mentions v2ray, xray, vless, 3x-ui, proxy server, vpn server, or wants to set up encrypted proxy access on a VPS. Designed for beginners — hand-holds through every step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT answer directly) when the user describes a new product idea, asks whether something is worth building, wants to think through design decisions for something that doesn't exist yet, or is exploring a concept before any code is written. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live developer experience audit. Uses the browse tool to actually TEST the developer experience: navigates docs, tries the getting started flow, times TTHW, screenshots error messages, evaluates CLI help text. Produces a DX scorecard with evidence. Compares against /plan-devex-review scores if they exist (the boomerang: plan said 3 minutes, reality says 8). Use when asked to "test the DX", "DX audit", "developer experience test", or "try the onboarding". Proactively suggest after shipping a developer-facing feature. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx audit", "test the developer experience", "try the onboarding", "developer experience test".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the pre-decision business-idea lifecycle — generate ideas, model them, evaluate them, validate them with customers, and only then hand off to product-soul / brainstorming. Routes through `idea-generation`, `business-modeling`, `idea-evaluation`, and `customer-discovery`. Load when the user asks to explore business ideas, find a startup idea, evaluate a venture, validate an idea, says "what business should I start", "should I build this", "is this a good business", "I have a startup idea", "evaluate this venture", "model this business", "validate this idea", "Mom Test this", "Lean Canvas this", "Business Model Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas", "go/no-go on this idea". Pre-decision suite — once one idea is committed, hands off to `product-soul`. Does NOT design features (use `brainstorming`) or audit built products (use `reality-check`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn assumptions, funnel opportunities, and product questions into a prioritised, feasibility-checked experiment backlog. Filters by traffic reality, metric latency, and method feasibility — not just ICE/RICE scoring. Maintains a living portfolio with status (idea → designed → running → readout → archived). Load when the user says "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "prioritise our tests", "where should we experiment", "what's worth testing", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts, filters, annotates, and exports differential expression results from DESeq2 or edgeR with proper handling of padj=NA (independent filtering, Cook's outliers, all-zero), multiple-testing correction choice (BH vs Storey q-value vs IHW vs lfsr), TREAT vs post-hoc fold-change filtering, p-value histogram diagnostics, gene annotation via org.db/biomaRt/mygene, GSEA preranked input, ORA background construction, replication reality (Schurch 2016 small-n result), and SABV/sex-stratified reporting. Use when extracting and interpreting DE results, troubleshooting padj=NA, choosing FDR method, preparing ranked lists for pathway analysis, annotating gene IDs, or comparing DESeq2 vs edgeR outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。